×
Search

866-540-5505

Se Habla Espanol
Menu
Search

Our Blog

Home/Blog/Seventh Circuit Ruling Against Northwestern University Clarifies Pleading Standard for ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims

Seventh Circuit Ruling Against Northwestern University Clarifies Pleading Standard for ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims

On March 23, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, on remand from the Supreme Court, explained how the “plausibility” pleading standard of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), should be applied to breach of fiduciary duty claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The Court’s ruling reversed and remanded claims the district court had dismissed alleging Northwestern University (“Northwestern” or “Defendants”) violated ERISA by imprudently administering Northwestern’s two defined contribution 403(b) retirement plans.

At the preceding stage in the litigation, the Supreme Court directed the Seventh Circuit to evaluate the plaintiffs’ claims under the pleading standard enumerated in landmark Supreme Court decisions Twombly and Iqbal, rejecting Defendants’ argument that the heightened pleading standard in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. 409 (2014) should apply.  Reiterating previous guidance, the Supreme Court clarified that while analysis of duty of prudence claims must be “context-specific,” the stricter Dudenhoeffer standard is reserved for cases involving Employee Stock Ownership Plans.

The Seventh Circuit accordingly determined that, at the pleadings stage, plausibility of the claims is the basic test. The Court explained that “a plaintiff must provide enough facts to show that a prudent alternative action was plausibly available, rather than actually available.” This is because “if a course of action was only possibly unavailable, further factual development on the pleadings will be necessary to resolve the claim on that explanation.”

Further, Twombly and Iqbal establish that plaintiffs must address only obvious alternative explanations for their claims at the pleadings stage. Therefore, “whether a claim survives dismissal necessarily depends on the strength or obviousness of the alternative explanation that the defendant provides.”

Applying the pleading standard specified by the Supreme Court, the Seventh Circuit concluded that two claims in the action survived dismissal: (1) Defendants’ failure to monitor excessive recordkeeping fees, and (2) Defendants’ failure to substitute retail share class funds for cheaper institutional share classes. Specifically, the Court found that Plaintiffs plausibly alleged that Defendants’ “failure to obtain comparable recordkeeping services at a substantially lesser rate was outside the range of reasonable actions that the university could take as a plan fiduciary.” In other words, “plaintiffs have pleaded enough to cross the line from possibility to plausibility.”

Updates to this blog will be provided as the matter progresses. The ruling is captioned Laura Divane, et al., v. Northwestern University, et al., case number 18-2569, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The originating case is Hughes, et al, v. Northwestern University, et. al., case number 1:16-cv-08157, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. A previous blog post on this matter can be viewed here.

The legal team at Miller Shah LLP has extensive experience representing class action and ERISA matters. If you have any questions regarding this subject or this post, please contact Alec Berin (ajberin@millershah.com) or Jonathan Dilger (jadilger@millershah.com). The firm can also be reached toll-free at (866) 540-5505.

Share Post:
facebooktwitterLinkedin

Categories

Archives

Contact
Miller Shah LLP

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call 866-540-5505 or complete the intake form to email us.
Alec J. Berin - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Alfonso Vilaboa - Of Counsel

NJ Hoboken |

Anika S. Keuning - Project Analyst

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Anna D’Agostino - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Betsy Ferling-Hitriz - Legal Assistant

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Bruce D. Parke - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Caroline Soper - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Christopher A. Miller - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Deborah C. England - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Edward H. Glenn - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Edward M. Fitzgerald - Staff Attorney

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

Elena M. DiBattista - Legal Assistant

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Elise M. Wilson - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Eric L. Young - Of Counsel

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Finn M. Mutrux - Office Staff

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

Gina S. Demetriades - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Heidi A. Wendel - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

James C. Shah - Partners

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James E. Miller - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jayne A. Goldstein - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Jillian M. Boyce - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jocelyn McNamara - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Johanna C. Richter - Law Clerk

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

John C. Roberts - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Jonathan Dilger - Office Staff

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Julie M. Capito - Legal Assistant

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Kolin C. Tang - Partners

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Laurie Rubinow - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Madison Gregg - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Marialisa Samo - Legal Assistant

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Mark Xiao - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Natalie Finkelman Bennett - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Nathan C. Zipperian - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Nicholas Day - Of Counsel

NJ Hoboken | 866-540-5505

Nicholas K. Ono - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Raffaele Scalcione - Of Counsel

IT Milan | 866-540-5505

Reilly K. Powers - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Robert W. Biela - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Ronald S. Kravitz - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Rrita Osmani - Project Analyst

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Shuping Li - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Stephen T. Rutkowski - Law Clerk

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Sue Moss - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Sydney D. Finlay - Associate

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Tina Moukoulis - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505