≡Menu

Category Archives: discrimination

January 20

EEOC Sues FedEx for Sexual Harassment and Sex Discrimination

What Is the EEOC’s Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against FedEx? The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has announced a sexual harassment lawsuit against the Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. According to the EEOC’s complaint, a female administrative employee at FedEx’s St. Rose, Louisiana facility was subjected to years of sexual harassment by her direct supervisor and after reporting the…

January 16

discrimination, Employment

EEOC Lawsuit Against Wendy’s Highlights Disability and Age Discrimination Risks for Employers

EEOC Files Disability and Age Discrimination Lawsuit Against Wendy’s On December 29, 2025, the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (“S.D. Ohio”) against Wendy’s International, LLC alleging disability and age discrimination against a Columbus-Ohio based district manager, Michael Salsburg. The complaint alleges Wendy’s violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act…

November 24

discrimination

EEOC Sues Coca-Cola Bottling Company United for Disability Discrimination

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has filed suit against Coca-Cola Bottling Company United (“CCBCU”), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). The complaint accuses CCBCU of unlawfully refusing to accommodate an employee with a disability and terminating them instead of providing a reasonable adjustment. Miller Shah LLP represents employees across the country in disability discrimination matters, including ADA enforcement actions aimed at promoting workplace equality. Key Allegations…

September 25

discrimination

EEOC Sues Smithfield for Pregnancy Discrimination—New Laws Like the PWFA and PUMP Act Raise the Stakes

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has sued Smithfield Fresh Meats Corporation for pregnancy discrimination after allegedly firing a pregnant worker who requested accommodations, marking one of the several recent enforcement actions under the new Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”). This case, along with the PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act (“PUMP Act”) now in effect, illustrates the increasing legal obligations employers face when handling pregnancy-related accommodations, lactation breaks, and…

September 23

discrimination

Employer Obligations for Nursing Mothers: Understanding Workplace Breastfeeding Rights and Accommodations

Breastfeeding workers are entitled to specific and mandatory workplace rights and accommodations under a variety of state and federal laws. Understanding these rights is critical for both employers and employees, as violations can result in detrimental impacts on the health and wellbeing of breastfeeding employees as well as potential legal repercussions for non-complaint employers. What Are the Federal Laws Governing Employer Obligations for Nursing Mothers? Many rules for employers governing…

August 25

discrimination

Court Revives Gender Discrimination Lawsuit Against Clariant After Clerk’s Firing

Dawn Hayes worked in an all-male factory as a logistics clerk for Clarient Plastics & Coatings USA Inc until 2018, when she was fired. Management fired Hayes during a company-wide reduction, explaining that she possessed fewer skills than her male coworkers. Hayes disagreed and filed suit, claiming that she was fired not because of her abilities, but because she is a woman. 6th Circuit Ruling on Gender Discrimination Lawsuit Initially,…

August 13

discrimination

Montclair State Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Disability Discrimination and FMLA Retaliation

Montclair State University Lawsuit Over Medical Leave and Termination Montclair State University is facing a lawsuit from a former employee -- Odessa Donzella -- who alleges she was fired after taking medical leave for celiac disease, claiming the university violated disability discrimination laws and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). She made two separate medical leave requests, and each went largely unaddressed. Shortly after submitting her first request for…

August 04

discrimination

EEOC Sues Restaurant Chain for Pregnancy Discrimination as Protections for Workers Expand

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit filed on June 24, 2024, a Pita Pit restaurant in Sioux Falls violated federal law after firing an employee after she requested accommodations for pregnancy-related nausea. The Pita Pit employee had informed her employer of her pregnancy and formally inquired if she could continue working from home for her first trimester. Instead of providing such accommodations, the employer called the pregnancy a “distraction,” and fired…

July 08

discrimination

Federal Court Lets AI Employment Discrimination Case Against Workday Move Forward

Court Allows Collective Action Over Alleged AI Age Discrimination On May 16, 2025, a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that Mobley v. Workday, Inc., a collective action alleging AI-based age employment discrimination, will proceed. The lawsuit claims that Workday violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) because its artificial intelligence-based applicant recommendation system discriminated against users by quickly rejecting potentially…

June 27

discrimination, Employment

California Reinforces Labor Protections: Workers’ Rights Apply Regardless of Immigration Status

On June 11, 2025, the California Labor Commissioner issued a news release reminding all workers of California labor rights. The Labor Commissioner notice stressed that these protections apply regardless of immigration status. What specific rights are guaranteed to workers under California labor law, and how do they apply to undocumented employees? All employees have the right to discuss their pay and their working conditions with their employer and other employees.…

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call 866-540-5505 or complete the intake form to email us. To inquire about employment opportunities with Miller Shah LLP, please see our Opportunities page.

Offices Throughout
the United States & Italy

Get Fort Lauderdale Directions

IT Milan

Fax number

866-540-5505

Telephone

Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing contact information, users acknowledge and give explicit consent to be contacted via the methods of communication provided, including SMS. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP to opt out.