Whistleblowers play a critical role in uncovering corporate and government fraud; however, many potential whistleblowers fear retaliation from their current or former employer. This article outlines the legal protections that are afforded to whistleblowers to prevent retaliation and encourage them to come forward.
Retaliation, in the context of whistleblower and employment law, occurs when an employer fires a whistleblower or takes any adverse action after they blow the whistle on prohibited conduct.
Adverse action includes but is not limited to:
If any of these actions are taken against an employee following their participation as a whistleblower in an investigation or litigation, that employee could be eligible for recourse under state and federal law.
Because many whistleblower cases are based on federal statutes that employ whistleblowers as critical providers of information, protecting those same whistleblowers has become a critical priority for federal legislation. Some of the most important federal laws protecting whistleblowers from retaliation are outlined below.
The Whistleblower Protection Act, as amended by the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, criminalizes the act of federal officials taking or threatening a “personnel action” against an employee or applicant in retaliation for a protected disclosure i.e. engaging in whistleblowing. Personnel action includes:
The False Claims Act (FCA) provides various financial remedies in the event of retaliation against a whistleblower or “relator” as they are referred to in the FCA. These remedies include reinstatement, up to double the back pay the relator would have received, interest on the back pay, compensation for lost benefits, and attorneys’ fees.
The Dodd-Frank Act provides similar protections and remedies as the False Claims Act. The primary difference between the two statutes is that the FCA protects whistleblowers in cases of fraudulent reimbursements being requested from the federal government, while the Dodd-Frank Act protects whistleblowers in securities and commodities cases.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, similar to the Dodd-Frank Act, protects whistleblowers from retaliation in cases relating to fraud against shareholders or any other act prohibited by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act differs in that it applies exclusively to publicly traded companies registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The primary purpose of the Sarbanes Oxley Act is to ensure the accuracy of corporate disclosures and protect investors from fraudulent financial reporting.
While various statutes protect whistleblowers from retaliation, recourse is dependent on evidence being presented. Whistleblowers making an intentional effort to document evidence of retaliation is therefore critical.
This could mean creating a detailed log of all incidents that includes the date, time, location, people involved, and description of what happened. Preserving emails and other communications from the employer is also critical. Performance review reports can also serve as evidence that the retaliatory act was without good cause.
Many states such as Pennsylvania have developed their own laws to protect whistleblowers from retaliation in addition to existing federal statutes. These laws differ from state-to-state, however generally they provide a wider range of protections to a broader group of whistleblowers. Typically, these protections apply in conjunction with federal statutes allowing for dual protection.
It is important to understand the specific protections for whistleblowers in your state. This can be achieved through researching your state whistleblower laws and/or consulting with an attorney. Information on how an experienced legal team can help you understand your rights as a whistleblower and navigate potential retaliation efforts are outlined in the next section.
Miller Shah has experience with representing whistleblowers and protecting them from retaliation across a broad spectrum of whistleblower cases including but not limited to:
If you are facing retaliation for blowing the whistle, Miller Shah can help you pursue legal recourse including reinstatement, back pay, and attorney fees. If you are interested in a free consultation, fill out the form below and one of our skilled attorney will reach out to you.
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505
FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505
CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CA San Diego | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
CA San Diego | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505
NJ Hoboken | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
IT Milan | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
NY New York City | 866-540-5505
CT Chester | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CA San Diego | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505
CA Los Angeles | 310-203-0600