×
Search

866-540-5505

Se Habla Espanol
Menu
Search

Our Blog

Home/Blog/New Jersey Stop-Work Order Against Teaneck Limo Company Shows Risks of Worker Misclassification

New Jersey Stop-Work Order Against Teaneck Limo Company Shows Risks of Worker Misclassification

On May 20, 2026, the New Jersey Department of Labor & Workforce Development (NJDOL) announced a stop-work order against a Teaneck limousine and taxi company, Kismet International Inc. t/a Kismet Int. Limo & Teaneck Taxi Service (“Kismet”).  Kismet was recently audited, revealing that the company misclassified 80 drivers from 2012-2015 and was found to owe a total balance of $207,358.81.

The decision was upheld through the full appeals process, and affirmed by the Superior Court of New Jersey. By treating these drivers as independent contractors, Kismet failed to make required contributions to the Unemployment Compensation Fund and the State Disability Benefit Fund. Consequently, drivers were deprived of the benefits typically afforded to employees.

What is Misclassification?

Under New Jersey law, workers are considered employees when they perform services for pay.  Employers sometimes classify their workers as independent contractors instead of as employees so as to avoid paying various benefits. It is the employer’s burden to prove that the individual in question qualifies as an independent contractor by satisfying all three prongs of the “ABC” test. The three components of New Jersey’s test are:

  1. The individual has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over the performance of work performed, both under contract of service and in fact; and
  2. The work is either outside the usual course of the business for which such service is performed, or the work is performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise for which such service is performed; and
  3. The individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business.

If the employer is unable to prove any one of these prongs, the worker is deemed by New Jersey law as an employee. NJDOL has proposed new regulations to codify its interpretations of the ABC test, as well as those of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, which expand on and clarify these three prongs.

The functional effect of the ABC test is that independent contractor classification in New Jersey is strict and narrow.  Simply being issued a 1099 or being labeled as an independent contractor in a contract doesn’t override the statutory test. Taxi companies often struggle to meet the second prong because drivers perform their core business. Thus, the ABC test is a solid mechanism for protecting workers’ rights in New Jersey.

Why does Classifying Workers as Independent Contractors Matter under New Jersey law?

Companies that misclassify workers face significant risks under New Jersey law, where the ABC test presumes employee status. Improper misclassification may result in the employer owing significant amounts in back wages, benefits, unpaid payroll tax contributions (unemployment, disability, family leave), and penalties. The New Jersey Wage & Hour Compliance Poster Packet determines penalties of up to 5% of the worker’s gross earnings over the prior twelve months, up to $250 per misclassified employee for a first violation and up to $1,000 per misclassified employee for subsequent violations, and additional damages of up to 200% of wages owed and suspension or revocation of business licenses.

Additionally, misclassifying employees as independent contractors can lead to lawsuits, including class action litigation, seeking unpaid minimum wages, overtime, back wages, liquidated damages, attorney fees, and penalties. Other risks include back-payment of employer payroll taxes, workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance contributions..

Companies must treat classification decisions as both a matter of legal compliance and strategic business practices. In a state like New Jersey that earnestly audits misclassification, a company suspected of misclassification may face multi-year audits, large benefit fund assessments, and collateral liability in other jurisdictions.

What Rights or Protections Can Misclassified Workers Lose and What Legal Remedies Are Available?

In New Jersey, worker misclassification can affect unemployment insurance contributions, temporary disability benefits, wage protections, payroll taxes, and other employment-related obligations.  Companies label workers as contractors to avoid payment of many benefit due workers, such as payroll contributions, insurance, overtime obligations, and other legal requirements. Misclassification can harm workers even when they are performing the same work as employees because they may lose access to protections and benefits provided by employee status.

Workers in New Jersey should consider their experience and circumstances when determining their classification status. Under the NJDOL’s Independent Contractors and Misclassification guidance, being classified as a 1099 contractor does not guarantee independent contractor status. Instead, the facts of the work relationship are determinative.

Workers in New Jersey who are found to be misclassified can avail themselves of several available legal remedies.  Awards might include back pay, damages, and retirement or disability contributions, among others.

For decades, attorneys at Miller Shah have successfully represented misclassified workers in filing wage and hour claims. If you have questions or concerns regarding classification, please contact us to learn more.

Disclaimer:The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Miller Shah LLP is not involved in the cases discussed, and any commentary is solely based on publicly available information.

Share Post:
Linkedinfacebooktwitter

Contact
Miller Shah LLP

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call 866-540-5505 or complete the intake form to email us. To inquire about employment opportunities with Miller Shah LLP, please see our Opportunities page.
Alec J. Berin - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Alfonso Vilaboa - Partners

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Ana Barba - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anika S. Keuning - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anna D’Agostino - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Bruce D. Parke - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Caroline Soper - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Christopher A. Miller - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Deborah C. England - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Elena M. DiBattista - Legal Assistant

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Elise M. Wilson - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Eric L. Young - Of Counsel

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Gina S. Demetriades - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Heidi A. Wendel - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Henry Fina - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Isack Fadlon - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James C. Shah - Partners

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James E. Miller - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jasmine Roman - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jayne A. Goldstein - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Jillian M. Lussier - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jocelyn McNamara - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Johanna C. Richter - Law Clerk

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Jonathan A. Dilger - Office Staff

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Katherine W. Frederick - Office Staff

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

Katie Canfield - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Kolin C. Tang - Partners

CA Orange County | 866-540-5505

Kyla Golding - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Laurie Rubinow - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Leanne Alvarado - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Madison A. Gregg - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Mark Xiao - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Matthew P. Suzor - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Natalie Finkelman Bennett - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Nathan C. Zipperian - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Nicholas Day - Of Counsel

NJ Hoboken | 866-540-5505

Nicholas K. Ono - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Nicole Jefferson - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Quintin C. Cerione - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Robert W. Biela - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Shuping Li - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Stephen T. Rutkowski - Law Clerk

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Sue Moss - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Sydney D. Finlay - Associate

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Tara Gideon - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tina Moukoulis - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tracy Feldman - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Zacky P. Rozio - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 310-203-0600