×
Search

866-540-5505

Se Habla Espanol
Menu
Search

Our Blog

Home/Blog/A $60 Billion Problem: Annual Medicare Losses Due to Fraud and Abuse

A $60 Billion Problem: Annual Medicare Losses Due to Fraud and Abuse

According to the Senior Medicare Patrol, Medicare loses an estimated $60 billion every year to fraud, errors, and abuse. From telehealth billing scams to genetic testing fraud, DME schemes to PBM misconduct, and other unlawful schemes, Medicare fraud is a serious—and seriously expensive—issue that affects all taxpayers. The scale of this waste highlights the critical role of the False Claims Act and whistleblowers in protecting the integrity of federal programs and the public fisc.

Estimates of the Impact of Medicare Fraud

While it’s impossible to determine the exact amount lost to Medicare fraud every year, the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA) conservatively estimates the financial scope of health care fraud to be around 3% of total health care expenditures (which are generally in the trillions of dollars).  Federal agencies like the National Institute of Health (NIH) hypothesize an even larger value, estimating that 3-10% of annual health care expenditures, or nearly $300 billion, could be lost every year to waste, fraud, and abuse.

Fortunately, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is constantly working to recover funds wrongfully expended because of Medicare Fraud.  Recently, on June 30, 2025, the DOJ announced a national health care fraud takedown that resulted in charges for 324 defendants in connection with over $14.5 billion in alleged fraud. The takedown involved multiple schemes across various states. According to the press release, “the government seized over $245 million in cash, luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and other assets as part of the coordinated enforcement efforts.”

Common Types of Medicare Fraud Schemes

Medicare fraud schemes generally involve the wrongful submission of claims for payment or reimbursement to Medicare.  Of course, the details of these schemes take many forms. As technology and anti-fraud practices evolve, so, unfortunately, do fraudulent actors.  The following are some of the most common schemes that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) encounters every year:

Telehealth Fraud

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, remote healthcare services have become a substantial and valuable option within the healthcare industry. But the telehealth industry’s spike in popularity has coincided with an increase in false reimbursement submissions to Medicare for telehealth services that were not provided or were not medically necessary.  In fact, these false claims have risen dramatically in the last five years. Telehealth schemes are also frequently employed in conjunction with other forms of Medicare fraud, wherein telehealth physicians are retained to provide unnecessary prescriptions or referrals to other medical products or services.

Genetic Testing Fraud

Another growing health care sector with a proportionally growing opportunity for fraud is genetic testing. As the technology and applications for genetic testing have advanced exponentially in recent years, so has genetic testing fraud. Recent false claims to Medicare for genetic testing have also involved telehealth physicians, who are retained for the express purpose of referring patients to unnecessary genetic testing services. The referring physicians are then paid for making the referrals, the genetic testing companies send kickbacks to the perpetrators of the scheme, and the unnecessary physician appointments and genetic tests are billed to Medicare.

Durable Medical Equipment Fraud

Durable medical equipment (DME) refers to medical equipment that can withstand frequent use such as wheelchairs, crutches, or any other medical device that could be used by a patient on a daily or semi-daily basis. DME fraud schemes often involve DME companies providing kickbacks to physicians in exchange for unnecessary prescriptions.

Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fraud

Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are third party companies that work as intermediaries between Medicare, pharmacies, drug manufacturers, and Medicare Advantage (MA) private insurers. Because of their access to so many stages of the pharmaceutical prescription pipeline, PBMs have multiple opportunities for fraud.  Common schemes involve paying physicians, MA insurers, or specialty pharmacies to prescribe, cover, or stock a particular drug so that the PBM can later receive kickbacks from the drug manufacturer for increasing sales of the drug.

Exposing Medicare Fraud through the False Claims Act

Under the False Claims Act, private individuals with knowledge of Medicare fraud, known as whistleblowers or relators, may bring suit on behalf of the government through a qui tam action. If litigation is successful and a settlement or judgment is reached, the whistleblower may be entitled to between 10-30% of the total monetary recovery, depending on the value of the information the whistleblower provided and the scope of the government’s involvement in the lawsuit.

Whistleblowers are critical in exposing Medicare fraud, as these schemes are often complex and shielded from public view. The DOJ relies heavily on the information provided by whistleblowers throughout their investigation of potential fraud actions and subsequent litigation.

Whistleblower Advocacy and Medicare Fraud Accountability at Miller Shah LLP

Miller Shah LLP is a nationally recognized law firm with decades of experience handling complex Medicare fraud litigation. We have the expertise, professionalism, and commitment necessary to see your case successfully through every stage of the litigation, from confidential submission to the DOJ to ultimate resolution. We are dedicated to ensuring that perpetrators of Medicare fraud are held accountable.

If you believe that you have information that could lead to the discovery of federal health care program fraud, Miller Shah can help you understand your situation and potential next steps. Fill out the form below for a free consultation.

Share Post:
Linkedinfacebooktwitter

Contact
Miller Shah LLP

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call 866-540-5505 or complete the intake form to email us. To inquire about employment opportunities with Miller Shah LLP, please see our Opportunities page.
Alec J. Berin - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Alfonso Vilaboa - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Ana Barba - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anika S. Keuning - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anna D’Agostino - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Betsy Ferling-Hitriz - Legal Assistant

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Bruce D. Parke - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Caroline Soper - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Christopher A. Miller - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Deborah C. England - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Elena M. DiBattista - Legal Assistant

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Elise M. Wilson - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Eric L. Young - Of Counsel

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Gina S. Demetriades - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Heidi A. Wendel - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Henry Fina - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Isack Fadlon - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James C. Shah - Partners

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James E. Miller - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jasmine Griswold - Legal Assistant

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jayne A. Goldstein - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Jillian M. Lussier - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jocelyn McNamara - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Johanna C. Richter - Law Clerk

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Jonathan A. Dilger - Office Staff

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Katie Edwards - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Kolin C. Tang - Partners

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Kyla Golding - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Laurie Rubinow - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Leanne Alvarado - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Madison A. Gregg - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Marialisa Samo - Legal Assistant

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Mark Xiao - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Matthew P. Suzor - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Natalie Finkelman Bennett - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Nathan C. Zipperian - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Nicholas Day - Of Counsel

NJ Hoboken | 866-540-5505

Nicholas K. Ono - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Nicole Jefferson - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Quintin C. Cerione - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Raffaele Scalcione - Of Counsel

IT Milan | 866-540-5505

Robert W. Biela - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Ronald S. Kravitz - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Rrita Osmani - Associate

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Shuping Li - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Stephen T. Rutkowski - Law Clerk

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Sue Moss - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Sydney D. Finlay - Associate

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Tara Gideon - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tina Moukoulis - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tracy Feldman - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Zacky P. Rozio - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 310-203-0600