×
Search

866-540-5505

Se Habla Espanol
Menu
Search

Our Blog

Home/Blog/Top 5 Signs that You are a Misclassified Telehealth Contractor

Top 5 Signs that You are a Misclassified Telehealth Contractor

The global telehealth is valued at over $83 billion in 2023 with an expected annual compounding growth rate of 24 percent through 2030, making it one of the largest and fastest growing technology industries in the world. However, with rapid growth comes the possibility of predatory and exploitative business practices. Many telehealth physicians, therapists, and nurse practitioners are classified as independent contractors—but under federal and state law, they may legally qualify as W-2 employees, according to the Department of Labor’s guidance on misclassification. This article outlines five key red flags that suggest you may be a misclassified telehealth contractor, exposing your employer to liability and potentially entitling you to unpaid benefits and legal protections.

What is the difference between being a telehealth contractor and an employee?

As a contractor, you are expected to report your income through a series of 1099 forms as opposed to a singular W-2 form if you were classified as an employee. While the legal differences between these two classifications under the Fair Labor Standards Act are complex, most tests essentially relate to how much control you have over your own work. If your contracted telehealth company exerts a large amount of control over your work including when and how you do your job, you may be a misclassified telehealth contractor.

What are the Top 5 Signs that You’re a Misclassified Telehealth Contractor?

While the legal determination of whether or you have been misclassified as a contractor depends on a long list of factors examined together, there are a few telltale signs that you have been incorrectly labelled as a 1099 virtual physician. This includes:

1. Being Required to Adhere to a Fixed Daily or Weekly Schedule

The most common form of employer control over the work of employees is scheduling. If your contracted telehealth company dictates your hours, even if based on an availability schedule that you submitted, you may have been misclassified as an independent contractor.

2. Productivity Standards Dictating How Long You Spend on Consultations or Follow-up Care

Beyond your hours or the “when” of your work, employment is also defined by your would-be employer dictating the “how” of your work. In the telehealth industry, this can mean providers placing strict productivity standards on their 1099 physicians, nurse practitioners, or therapists that regulate the length of time that can be spent on both patient consultations and follow-up appointments.

3. Restrictions Being Placed on Your Vacation Time or Time Away from the Virtual Office

Another way that telehealth providers exert employment-level control over the “when” of their 1099 healthcare workers is limiting or restricting your decision-making surrounding vacation time or time away from work. If your associated telehealth company has firm restrictions that limit when and how much you may be allocated towards time away from work it could be a dead giveaway that you are a misclassified telehealth contractor.

4. Required Attendance at Regular Company Meetings

Beyond controlling the “when” of your work, mandatory company meetings can also demonstrate that you are an integral part of the telehealth firm’s business. This is another important distinction when determining whether or not a misclassification has occurred and could mean that you are performing the additional duties of an employee while being deprived of the benefits.

5. Being Expected to Respond to Requests Within Short Timeframes

Another factor commonly seen in misclassified telehealth contractors is the telehealth firm expecting quick turnaround time when it comes to responding to requests. If you were truly an independent contractor, the timeline of your interactions with the firm would function more based on your ability to respond rather than the needs of the firm. If your firm expects you to respond to requests quickly irrespective of any other work you could be committed to at that time, this could be a sign that your firm views you as a full-time employee as well as an integral part of their business operations.

While other signs of 1099 misclassification exist within the telehealth industry, these five are both the most common and the most indicative.

What are the Consequences of Misclassification?

Misclassifying employees as 1099 contractors, whether in telehealth or any other industry, violates both state and federal law. Misclassified telehealth contractors can lose out on:

  • Overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) (for those not exempt under FLSA’s professional exemption) and state law
  • Employer-paid payroll taxes (Social Security, Medicare)
  • Health insurance, retirement plans, and other benefits
  • Protected leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
  • Unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation coverage
  • Legal protections under anti-discrimination and whistleblower laws

Additionally, telehealth firms that engage in employee misclassification can face criminal or civil penalties including class or collective actions.

How Does Miller Shah LLP Help Misclassified Telehealth Contractors Understand and Assert Their Rights?

Miller Shah is committed to ensuring that telehealth workers are properly classified and receiving any and all benefits they are entitled to under the law. As part of this commitment, Miller Shah actively investigates telemedicine companies that misclassify physicians, nurse practitioners, or therapists as 1099 contractors as part of our broader practice in misclassification claims.

If you were misclassified as a 1099 physician while working in telehealth, you may be entitled to compensation, additional benefits, and legal protection. If you believe this was the case, please fill out the form below. Beyond these listed benefits, your case could help prevent others from experiencing similar misclassification.

Share Post:
Linkedinfacebooktwitter

Contact
Miller Shah LLP

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call 866-540-5505 or complete the intake form to email us. To inquire about employment opportunities with Miller Shah LLP, please see our Opportunities page.
Alec J. Berin - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Alfonso Vilaboa - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Ana Barba - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anika S. Keuning - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anna D’Agostino - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Betsy Ferling-Hitriz - Legal Assistant

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Bruce D. Parke - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Caroline Soper - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Christopher A. Miller - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Deborah C. England - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Elena M. DiBattista - Legal Assistant

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Elise M. Wilson - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Eric L. Young - Of Counsel

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Gina S. Demetriades - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Heidi A. Wendel - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Henry Fina - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Isack Fadlon - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James C. Shah - Partners

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James E. Miller - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jasmine Griswold - Legal Assistant

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jayne A. Goldstein - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Jillian M. Lussier - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jocelyn McNamara - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Johanna C. Richter - Law Clerk

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Jonathan A. Dilger - Office Staff

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Katie Edwards - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Kolin C. Tang - Partners

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Kyla Golding - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Laurie Rubinow - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Leanne Alvarado - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Madison A. Gregg - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Marialisa Samo - Legal Assistant

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Mark Xiao - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Matthew P. Suzor - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Natalie Finkelman Bennett - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Nathan C. Zipperian - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Nicholas Day - Of Counsel

NJ Hoboken | 866-540-5505

Nicholas K. Ono - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Nicole Jefferson - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Quintin C. Cerione - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Raffaele Scalcione - Of Counsel

IT Milan | 866-540-5505

Robert W. Biela - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Ronald S. Kravitz - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Rrita Osmani - Associate

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Shuping Li - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Stephen T. Rutkowski - Law Clerk

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Sue Moss - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Sydney D. Finlay - Associate

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Tara Gideon - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tina Moukoulis - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tracy Feldman - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Zacky P. Rozio - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 310-203-0600