×
Search

866-540-5505

Se Habla Espanol
Menu
Search

Understanding Shareholder Derivative Actions

Home/Practice Areas/Business Counseling & Corporate Transactions/Understanding Shareholder Derivative Actions

Understanding Shareholder Derivative Actions

A shareholder derivative action is a lawsuit brought by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation against officers, directors, or other insiders whose misconduct has harmed the company. These cases are not brought for personal recovery (although the shareholder may recover litigation costs), but to protect the corporation itself and, indirectly, its shareholders.

Derivative actions play a vital role in holding corporate leaders accountable for breaches of fiduciary duty, corporate waste, fraud, and other misconduct that damages the company’s financial health and reputation.

Do you need to speak to an attorney?

Common Grounds for Shareholder Derivative Actions

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Claims that directors or officers failed to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders by engaging in self-dealing or bad-faith transactions.

Corporate Mismanagement

Allegations of waste or reckless oversight that harms the company, which rise above simple poor decision making.

Fraud or Misrepresentation

Executives providing false or misleading information about the company’s financial condition, business practices, or prospects.

Conflicts of Interest

Insiders engaging in self-dealing or related-party transactions that benefit themselves at the expense of the corporation.

Failure to Address Misconduct

Boards failing to investigate or act on red flags related to employee misconduct, regulatory violations, or compliance failures.

Examples of Shareholder Derivative Cases

  • Directors approving executive compensation packages that are excessive and not aligned with shareholder value.
  • A board failing to prevent or disclose widespread regulatory violations.
  • Corporate officers engaging in insider transactions that harm the company’s bottom line.
  • Shareholders bringing claims after a company’s reputation and stock price fall due to undisclosed misconduct.

Remedies in Shareholder Derivative Actions

  • Corporate Reforms – Court orders requiring governance improvements or oversight mechanisms.
  • Monetary Recovery – Funds recovered for the benefit of the company, not individual shareholders.
  • Injunctive Relief – Preventing future misconduct or enforcing fiduciary obligations.
  • Fee Awards – In some cases, plaintiffs may recover attorneys’ fees for securing corporate benefits.

Proving a Derivative Action

To succeed in a derivative lawsuit, plaintiffs generally must show:

  • They are shareholders of the company.
  • The alleged misconduct harmed the corporation as a whole.
  • The directors or officers breached their duties, acted improperly, or failed to act when required.
  • A demand was made on the board to take corrective action, or such a demand would have been futile.

Evidence can include internal corporate documents, financial disclosures, communications between directors and officers, and testimony from insiders.

Miller Shah LLP’s Role in Shareholder Derivative Actions

Miller Shah LLP has extensive experience prosecuting shareholder derivative claims nationwide. The firm represents investors in holding directors and officers accountable for misconduct that harms the corporation and diminishes shareholder value. Through careful investigation and strategic litigation, Miller Shah helps enforce fiduciary duties, recover losses, and implement reforms that protect corporate integrity.

FAQ About Shareholder Derivative Actions

What is a shareholder derivative action?

A lawsuit brought by a shareholder on behalf of the corporation against directors, officers, or third parties who harmed the company.

Do I recover money directly as a shareholder?

No. Any monetary recovery goes to the corporation, though reforms and recovered funds indirectly benefit shareholders.

How is a derivative action different from a securities class action?

A securities class action seeks recovery for individual investor losses, while a derivative action seeks recovery for harm to the corporation itself.

What is the “demand requirement”?

Shareholders generally must request that the board take corrective action before filing suit, unless doing so would clearly be futile.

Who pays for the lawsuit?

If successful, the court may award attorneys’ fees to be paid by the corporation because the action benefits the company.

Over 1 BILLION Recovered

Our team is equipped and prepared for complicated, high-stakes cases in all areas of business and civil litigation. We continuously strive to achieve the best possible results for our clients.

Novartis False Claims Act Settlement

$642 Million

Novartis False Claims Act Settlement
DST ERISA Class Action Settlement

$124.6 Million

DST ERISA Class Action Settlement
Teva False Claims Act Settlement

$54 Million

Teva False Claims Act Settlement
Norwegian Salmon Antitrust Settlement

$33 Million

Norwegian Salmon Antitrust Settlement
Virgin Airlines Wage and Hour Settlement

$31 Million

Virgin Airlines Wage and Hour Settlement
AMC Securities Settlement

$18 Million

AMC Securities Settlement
Eversource Energy ERISA Class Action Settlement

$14 Million

Eversource Energy ERISA Class Action Settlement
Universal Health Services ERISA Class Action Settlement

$12.5 Million

Universal Health Services ERISA Class Action Settlement
MedStar ERISA Class Action Settlement

$11.8 Million

MedStar ERISA Class Action Settlement
Safeway ERISA Class Action Settlement

$8.5 Million

Safeway ERISA Class Action Settlement
LinkedIn ERISA Class Action Settlement

$6.75 Million

LinkedIn ERISA Class Action Settlement
IQVIA Inc. ERISA Class Action Settlement

$3.5 Million

IQVIA Inc. ERISA Class Action Settlement
Coca-Cola ERISA Class Action Settlement

$3.5 Million

Coca-Cola ERISA Class Action Settlement
Beth Israel Medical ERISA Class Action Settlement

$2.9 Million

Beth Israel Medical ERISA Class Action Settlement
Rush University Medical ERISA Class Action Settlement

$2.9 Million

Rush University Medical ERISA Class Action Settlement
L Brands ERISA Class Action Settlement

$2.75 Million

L Brands ERISA Class Action Settlement
Omnicom ERISA Class Action Settlement

$2.45 Million

Omnicom ERISA Class Action Settlement

Words From Our Clients

Contact
Miller Shah LLP

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call 866-540-5505 or complete the intake form to email us. To inquire about employment opportunities with Miller Shah LLP, please see our Opportunities page.
Alec J. Berin - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Alfonso Vilaboa - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Ana Barba - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anika S. Keuning - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Anna D’Agostino - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Betsy Ferling-Hitriz - Legal Assistant

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Bruce D. Parke - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Caroline Soper - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Christopher A. Miller - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Deborah C. England - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Elena M. DiBattista - Legal Assistant

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Elise M. Wilson - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Eric L. Young - Of Counsel

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Gina S. Demetriades - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Heidi A. Wendel - Of Counsel

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Henry Fina - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Isack Fadlon - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James C. Shah - Partners

CA Los Angeles | 866-540-5505

James E. Miller - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jasmine Griswold - Legal Assistant

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jayne A. Goldstein - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Jillian M. Lussier - Office Staff

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Jocelyn McNamara - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Johanna C. Richter - Law Clerk

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Jonathan A. Dilger - Office Staff

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Katie Edwards - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Kolin C. Tang - Partners

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Kyla Golding - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Laurie Rubinow - Partners

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Leanne Alvarado - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Madison A. Gregg - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Marialisa Samo - Legal Assistant

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Mark Xiao - Associate

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Matthew P. Suzor - Associate

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Natalie Finkelman Bennett - Partners

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Nathan C. Zipperian - Partners

FL Fort Lauderdale | 866-540-5505

Nicholas Day - Of Counsel

NJ Hoboken | 866-540-5505

Nicholas K. Ono - Project Analyst

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Nicole Jefferson - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Quintin C. Cerione - Project Analyst

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Raffaele Scalcione - Of Counsel

IT Milan | 866-540-5505

Robert W. Biela - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Ronald S. Kravitz - Of Counsel

CA San Francisco | 866-540-5505

Rrita Osmani - Associate

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Shuping Li - Law Clerk

NY New York City | 866-540-5505

Stephen T. Rutkowski - Law Clerk

CT Chester | 866-540-5505

Sue Moss - Legal Assistant

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Sydney D. Finlay - Associate

CA San Diego | 866-540-5505

Tara Gideon - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tina Moukoulis - Staff Attorney

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Tracy Feldman - Office Staff

PA Philadelphia | 866-540-5505

Zacky P. Rozio - Of Counsel

CA Los Angeles | 310-203-0600