≡Menu

Category Archives: Class Action

February 07

Class Action, ERISA

Supreme Court Greenlights Excessive Investment Fees Lawsuit, Sides with 401(k) Participants

On January 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled that Plaintiffs, 401(k) plan participants of Northwestern University (“Northwestern” or the “University”), could proceed with their lawsuit against Northwestern and the administrators of the University’s 401(k) retirement plan (the “Plan”) for alleged mismanagement of the Plan. Northwestern, like many corporations and non-profit organizations, offers a defined contribution retirement plan, whereby eligible employees set aside a certain percentage…

December 07

Class Action

2019 Nissan Versa & Altima Investigation

Summary of Investigation: Nissan drivers are taking legal action over a possible defect in 2019 model year Versa and Altima vehicles containing a Xtronic Continuously Variable Transmission (“CVT”). The alleged defect causes the vehicles to suddenly shake and jerk (commonly referred to as “juddering” or “shuddering”) when drivers attempt to accelerate. The problems cause the Versa and Altimas to, in some cases lag or delay when the driver tries to accelerate,…

November 02

Class Action, Securities

AMC Securities Lawsuit: Preliminary Settlement Papers Filed

Miller Shah LLP, on behalf of a class of individuals and entities that purchased or acquired the common stock of AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (“AMC” or the “Company”) during the class period defined below (“Class”), has filed a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement in the matter of Hawaii Structural Ironworkers Pension Trust Fund v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. et al. The settlement will provide $18 million…

September 30

Class Action, Securities

Twitter to Settle Securities Lawsuit for $809.5 Million

Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter” or the “Company”) has agreed to pay $809.5 million to settle a class action securities lawsuit filed by investors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The lawsuit was originally filed in September 2016 and sought remedies under Sections 10 and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The lawsuit alleged that from February 6 to July 28, 2015, Twitter and…

September 22

Class Action, ERISA

ERISA: Court Denies Motion to Dismiss in IQVIA Lawsuit

On September 21, 2021, a District Judge in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina ruled that an ERISA class action lawsuit against IQVIA, Inc., the Board of Directors of IQVIA Holdings, Inc., and its Investment Benefits Committee (collectively, “IQVIA” or “Defendants”), was fit to proceed, denying IQVIA’s effort to dismiss the suit. IQVIA is the plan sponsor for the IQVIA 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”).…

September 17

Class Action, ERISA

Court Denies Motion to Dismiss in L Brands ERISA Lawsuit

On September 16, 2021, a district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio determined that a proposed class action lawsuit against L Brands, Inc., L Brands Service Company, LLC, and its Retirement Plan Committee, (collectively, “L Brands,” the “Company,” or “Defendants”) was fit to proceed, denying the Company’s attempt to dismiss the action. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of participants and beneficiaries of…

August 03

Class Action, ERISA

Omnicom ERISA Class Action Defeats Motion to Dismiss

On August 2, 2021, a District Judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that the motion to dismiss the ERISA class action lawsuit against Omnicom Group, Inc. ("Omnicom"), the Administrative Committee of the Omnicom Group Retirement Savings Plan (“Administrative Committee”), and individual members of the Administrative Committee (collectively, “Defendants”) was granted in part and denied in part. All claims were allowed to…

July 23

Class Action, ERISA

Biogen ERISA Matter Overcomes Motion to Dismiss

On July 22, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts determined that a proposed class action lawsuit against Biogen, Inc. (“Biogen”) was fit to proceed, denying most of Biogen’s attempt to dismiss the legal action. Biogen is the plan sponsor for the Biogen 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”). With assets totaling over $1 billion, the Plan is in the top 0.1% of all 401(k) plans by size…

June 29

Class Action, Consumer Protection

Bank of America: Judge Grants Initial Approval of Class Action Settlement

On June 28, 2021, a District Judge in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement in an action against Bank of America, N.A. The Court preliminarily approved the Settlement Agreement as fair, reasonable, and adequate. The lawsuit, initially filed in 2020 by attorneys from Miller Shah LLP, alleges that Bank of America “knowingly concealed, suppressed,…

May 06

ERISA, Class Action, Employee Benefits

Class Action ERISA Lawsuit Against Quest Diagnostics to Proceed

On May 4, 2021, a District Judge in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that a class action lawsuit against Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (“Quest”), the Quest Benefits Administration Committee (“Administrative Committee”), the Quest Investment Committee (“Investment Oversight Committee”), and individual members of the Committees (collectively, “Defendants”) was fit to proceed, denying Defendants’ attempt to dismiss the legal action. The lawsuit is being brought on…

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call 866-540-5505 or complete the intake form to email us. To inquire about employment opportunities with Miller Shah LLP, please see our Opportunities page.

Offices Throughout
the United States & Italy

Get Fort Lauderdale Directions

IT Milan

Fax number

866-540-5505

Telephone

Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing contact information, users acknowledge and give explicit consent to be contacted via the methods of communication provided, including SMS. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP to opt out.